The influence of centralization on innovation, mechanization and complexity in a group of mexican organizations

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Apr 1, 1985
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35426/IAv12n56.04

Main Article Content

Miguel A. Asomoza B.

Abstract

The investigación, modifies scales on innovation, centralization, complexity and the mechanization in the Mexican labor context. It analyzes the infor­ maron through correlations, factor analysis and discriminating analysis pointing out validity and reliability of the instruments and the nature of the associations and their trascendency for the study of the Mexican organiza-
tions.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 12 No. 56 (1985): Journal 56
Section
Publicados
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Aiken, M. y Hage, J: Organizational Alienación. Ameritan Sociological Review, 31 (August 1966),497-507.

Aiken, M. y Hage,J: Relationship of Centralización to Other Structural Properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12 (June 1967), Page 77.

Blau, P.M.: The Hierarchy o f Authority in Organi- zations. American Journal of Sociology, 73 (Ja- nuary 19681,453-467.

Blau, P.M.; Heydebrand, W. V., y Stauffer, The Structure of Small Bureaucracies. American So­ ciológica! Review, 31 (April 1966), 179- 191).

Faunce, W.A.: Problems of an Industrial Society (New York: McGraw-Hill, 19681, PP- 42-44.

Forehand, G. A.: assessments of Innovative Beha- vior: Pardal Criteria ofr the Assessment of Exe- cutive Performance, Journal of Applied Psycho- logy» 47 (June, 1963), p. 206.

Hage, J. y Aiken, M.: Program Changeand Organi­ zational Properties. American Journal of Socio­ logy, 72 (March 1967), 503-519.

Hall, R.H.: Haas, J.E.,y Johnson, N J.: Organizatio­ nal Size, Complexity and Formalízation. Amen- can Sociological Review, 32 (December 1967), 903-912.

Hickson, DJ.; Pugh, D.S. y Pheysey, D.C.: Opera- tions Technology and Organización Structure: An Empirical Appraisal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14 (September 1969), 378-397.

Indik, B.P.: Organización Size and Member Partici­ pación. Human Relations, 18 (1965), 339-349.

Inkson, J.H.K.; Pugh, D.S., y Hickson, D.J.: Orga- nization Context and Structure: An Abhreviated Replicadon. Administrative Science Quarterly 15 (September 1970), 318-329.

Jerome, H.: Mechanization in Industry (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1934), pp. 41-42.

Meyer M.W.: Two Authority Structuresof Bureau- cratic Organizaron. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13 (September 1968)211-228.

Nie, N.H.: Hull, C.H.; Jenkins, J.G.; Steinhrenner, K. Bent, D.H.: Statistical Package of the Social Sciences (SPSS) Ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1975.

Patchen, M.: Some Questionnaire Measuresof Em- plyee Motivation and Morales (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 1965), p. 3.

Price, J.L.: Handbook of Organizational Measure- ment. Ed. D.C. Heathand Co. E.U.A., 1972.

Pugh, D.S.: Hickson, D.J.: Hinings, C.R. y Tumer, C.: Dimensions of Organizational Structure. Ad­ ministrative Science Quarterly, 13 (June 1968), 65-105.

Whisler, T.L.: Measuring Centralización of Control in Business Organizations, in New Perspectivas in Organization Research. Ed. W.N. Cooper H. J. Leavitt, and M.W. Skelly, H (New York: Wilcy, 1964), pp. 314-333.